Ytringsposten: ICC Norway Public Version

From:
LHFW - Norwegian
AB - Norwegian
LL - Norwegian
RL - Norwegian

Date:
May.8.2021

To:
The International Criminal Court Office of the Prosecutor Communications Post Office Box 19519 2500 CM The Hague The Netherlands Email:
otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int

BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (TREATY OF ROME, ART. 15.1, 53 and 21)

IN THE MATTER OF GENOSIDE (Chapter 6)
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY (Chapter 7)
AS WELL AS WAR CRIMES AGAINST CIVILIANS (Chapter 8)

THE NUREMBERG CODEX / HELSINKI DECLARATION

Subject of complain:
The Government of Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Poland, included ALL national and international “stakeholders” listed in “ICC CLAIM of MAY 8. 2021”

This script is for NORWAY, all other countries listed will be merged to this case with a separate appendix marked each countries name. (Appendix Denmark, Sweden, Poland)

We address you in the name of the “Ad hoc Covid Fellowship”, a fellowship under establishment, in which the members are jurists, physicians, doctors, business owners, public and general activists and whistle blowers, who made a choice to exercise their democratic right not to receive the experimental medical treatment (Corona immunization), and who feel that great pressures, hard and illegal, are exerted upon them on behalf of the above mentioned government, members of Parliaments, local authorities, ministers, health authorities, doctors and nurses, and by an ongoing psychological warfare by the state and main stream media

We have tried to raise this case through both local Norwegian police and the centralized KRIPOS without any success, we don’t even get the case registered after several attempts. The statute for the ICC declares that “The ICC is intended to complement, not to replace, national criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when States do not or are unwilling or unable to do so genuinely. (article 17-1-a). This is such a case, that is why we address the ICC directly.

With reference to Article 21 C, we humble ask the prosecutor of ICC to use the Norwegian Disputes Act, chapter 34, §34-1 b, for temporary injunction, to INSTANTLY STOP all measures, vaccines included, to prevent more deaths, injured, forclosures, and human suffering in general during the time needed for ICC to investigate the case

We wish to begin with the basic knowledge on the subject matter:
The “Corona Virus Vaccine” is an innovative medical treatment, which has only recently obtained FDA Approval in the United States (in an emergency use procedure only), an approval that is not final, and with details of 22 side effects to the vaccine. Additionally, it is clear to all the medical factors that the subject of the long-range effect and safety of the treatment on its recipients are unknown. It is important to state that never until now, were administered in the entire world immunization by this medical technology of introduction of a synthetic M-RNA to the body, and all the previous immunizations operated in a totally different manner, by the introduction of a deactivated or weakened virus and natural arousal of the immunity system against it

As declared by 3 senior virologists, the risks anticipated by this innovative medical treatment are hereby enclosed as ICC CLAIM – page 8 § b.

“Nuremberg Code” – A medical ethics code issued based on laws under which the Nazi criminals were judged for conducting horrible medical experiments during the Second World War, in the physicians’ trial known by the Nuremberg Trials. The Nuremberg Code later constituted the base for the Helsinki Declaration Legislation, as well as the base for the Patient’s Rights laws in all countries

It is our intention to present to you and detail how in the State of Norway, the Government of each country with its ministers, health authorities and local authorities, additional senior’s factors, violate the Nuremberg Code in an unlawful manner, blatant and extreme, and to our regret, not only in a single aspect, but many, too many!

a.
Informed consent to participate in a medical treatment – a first principle of the Nuremberg Code, is a willingness and informed consent by the person, to receive treatment and participate in an experiment.

The person is supposed to activate freedom of choice without the intervention of a factor implying force, deceit, fraud, threat, solicitation, or any other type of binding or coercion.

When the heads of the Ministry of Health as well as the Prime Minister of each country, presented the vaccines in each country, and began the vaccination of citizens of each country (December 27.2020), in which the vaccination were not advised, that in practice, they are taking part in a medical experiment, and that their consent is required for this under the Nuremberg Code/Helsinki-declaration, and only when it became apparent that indeed the Prime Minister signed an Agreement with the EUs EMA, (European Medicine Agency) and the EU Commission, that it indeed a medical experiment, and that his was the essence of the agreement.

This, as a matter of fact, is a genetic medical experiment on human beings, performed without the informed consent and under a severe and blatant offense of the Nuremberg Code. Informed consent is NOT possible since relevant information is not available, not even on direct demand to the health authorities. The reply given, is sending us back to the same webpages where the info requested DONT exist, and they also reject any responsibility to inform «humans/living being» when they say they only reply with this info to other legal fictions like other governmental entities, but none of them is subjects for this vaccine project. (a1)

We also need to bring to the courts attention, that FOLKEHELSEINSTITUTTET (FHI) made a survey, asking the public WHY they wanted to take the vaccine. 3 major arguments was given, but NON OF THEM APPLY to “the real world” since none of them is valid and can be meet by taking the vaccine. Translated, the publics YES to the vaccine is based on the BELIVE that:

-Taking the vaccine will reduce the number of Covid infection in the society. 79% (not valid)

- Taking the vaccine will protect their family and elders. 78% (not valid)

- Taking the vaccine will give them the normal way of life back to like it was before Covid. 69% (not valid)

NO Governmental entity (or media) has done anything to clear out this false believes and misunderstandings made by MSM propaganda, who means NON of the participants to this experimental vaccines has given their TRUE informed consent when it’s all based on misunderstandings, misleading propaganda, and the TOTAL lack of actual TRUE information (a-5)

The practice mentioned is in direct violation of the Treaty of Rome chapter 8 Paragraph 2
(i) Wilful killing
(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments,
(iii) Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health

(i) Elders in Norway died in large numbers short time after being injected with this experimental vaccine, but they did NOT stop the project. Our authorities claimed this people was very old with a short lifetime left anyway, but it does NOT give anyone the right to kill them with these injections like they did. Norway made it to the frontpage globally for this practice.(a-2)

(ii) The project is clearly a “Biological experiment” using CRISPR gene scissors and mRNA

(iii) The numbers for dead and seriously injured tells us that the experimental vaccine causes more dead and seriously injured than MEDICALLY UN-TREATED COVID-19 (a-3)

- However, AstraZeneca is put on hold with the argument that the risk of death is higher from the vaccine than from Covid, but the numbers from LEGEMIDDELVERKET shows us, that AstraZeneca is one of the “vaccine” with the LOWEST death toll, so it makes no sense that they stop on of the least deadly option, but keeps up the program for the others where death toll is way higher. (a-3, a-4)

(a-1) The yellow marked line say (translated)
Unfortunately, we don’t have capacity to reply to questions from private persons